Mixed Second Order KineticsPatrick McLaurin |
We’ll first solve for the first-order integrated rate law using variable substitution so the variable substitution method can be understood for the following reaction:
A → products
The differential rate equation is obtained by setting the infinitesimal average rate equal to the rate law.
What follows is the variable transformation to x, which is an extent of reaction as measured by how much [A] has been consumed.
Substituting into the differential rate equation:
Rearranging and integrating:
−ln([A]0 − x) |x0xf = kt |t0tf |
−ln([A]0 − xf) + ln([A]0 − x0) = k(tf − t0) |
Where x0 = 0 at t0 = 0.
−ln([A]0 − xf) + ln[A]0 = ktf |
Substituting the definition of [A] for xf = x at time tf = t gives:
And we obtain the normal first-order integrated rate law:
We’ll now solve for the second-order integrated rate law using variable transformation for the reaction:
A + B → products
Variable transformation to x:
Substituting into the differential rate law:
Rearranging and integrating:
In the special case where [A]0 = [B]0 (and therefore [A] = [B] at all times), the solution becomes effectively the same as for a second order reaction of the type "2 A → products", except without the multiplicative factor of 2 in the kt term.
In the specific case where [A]0 ≠ [B]0, partial-fraction decomposition allows us to separate the left-hand side into a sum of fractions.
Multiplying by ([A]0 − x)([B]0 − x) on both sides:
1 = Y([B]0 − x) + Z([A]0 − x) |
Distributing:
1 = Y[B]0 − Yx + Z[A]0 − Zx |
Collecting terms:
1 = Y[B]0 + Z[A]0 − (Y+Z)x |
The left-hand side must be equal to the right-hand side.
There are no terms in x on the left-hand side so the x terms must be equal to 0x = 0.
Now we just need to figure out what Z is using the terms that are not in x:
This allows us to write the original fraction from equation 1 as the sum of two fractions from equation 2:
| = | 1 |
|
([A]0 − x)([B]0 − [A]0) |
| + | 1 |
|
([B]0 − x)([A]0 − [B]0) |
| |
The solution of the differential rate equation is now easier:
∫ | 1 |
|
([A]0 − x)([B]0 − [A]0) |
| + | 1 |
|
([B]0 − x)([A]0 − [B]0) |
|
| = k | ∫ | dt |
| (−ln([A]0 − x) |x0xf) + | | (−ln([B]0 − x) |x0xf) = kt |
−ln([A]0 − xf) + ln([A]0 − x0) |
|
([B]0 − [A]0) |
| + | −ln([B]0 − xf) + ln([B]0 − x0) |
|
([A]0 − [B]0) |
| = kt |
−ln[A] + ln[A]0 |
|
([B]0 − [A]0) |
| + | −ln[B] + ln[B]0 |
|
([A]0 − [B]0) |
| = kt |
−ln[A] + ln[A]0 |
|
([B]0 − [A]0) |
| − | −ln[B] + ln[B]0 |
|
([B]0 − [A]0) |
| = kt |
−ln[A] + ln[A]0 + ln[B] − ln[B]0 |
|
([B]0 − [A]0) |
| = kt |
−ln[A] + ln[A]0 + ln[B] − ln[B]0 = ([B]0 − [A]0)kt |
ln | | + ln | | = ([B]0 − [A]0)kt |
ln | | = −ln | | + ([B]0 − [A]0)kt |
ln | | = ln | | + ([B]0 − [A]0)kt |
Or if you wanted to reverse the sign on everything:
ln | | = ln | | + ([A]0 − [B]0)kt |
This document was translated from LATEX by
HEVEA.